Senator Cornyn's remarks, published in today's Houston Chronicle as an editorial, can be viewed here. In part:
"Judge Sotomayor's
speeches suggest a surprisingly radical view of the law…. In her speeches, she argued that there is no such thing
as 'law'; that there is no objectivity in law; that courts should
change the law to make new policy; and that ethnicity and gender can
and even should impact a judge's decision-making…. Judge Sotomayor repeatedly stated at the hearing that it
is the role of courts to interpret the law rather than make law…. In her view, everything
a court does is by definition an 'interpretation' of the law that
doesn't 'make' law. That's an invitation to engage in judicial
lawlessness."
One might think that, if you want a guide to her judicial behavior, you could look at her *judicial behavior,* rather than some speeches.