Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation Debate

There’s an interesting exchange going on over at The University of Chicago Law School
Faculty Blog on "Ambiguity
about Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry into Legal Interpretation” by Ward
Farnsworth, Dustin F. Guzior, and Anup Malani.  Malani’s opening remarks are here.  So far, responses are up from Einer Elhauge (Harvard),
William Eskridge
(Yale), and Judge Stephen
Williams (D.C. Circuit), as well as a response to the responses from Ward
Farnsworth of Boston University. According to the debate
introduction, Judge Frank Easterbrook and Judge Richard Posner are also
expected to respond.  Start here at the homepage, then scroll down to follow the entire debate.