“No Phone Zones,” Electronic Gadgetry and (My) Bad Manners

I had a lively conversation yesterday with my friend and colleague Leslie Garfield about electronic gadgetry and law faculty etiquette (she scores well in both categories, I must add).  Here are her thoughts, posted with permission.

Funny how easily a post about an old fashioned hobby can raise a newfangled issue.  I read with interest Jessie Owley's post (here) about knitting during faculty meetings. ( I have also watched first hand as she spun her needles at record pace). It made me wonder more deeply about the place of technology in small meetings.    As a faculty member I have come to embrace the value of bringing  PDAs, iPads and even laptops to faculty meetings. But I query whether there are limits to when we as faculty should remain wired.  Should  we embrace a sort of "Oprah No Phone Zone" during recruitment interviews?  What about when a colleague is delivering a small faculty colloquium?  I sense a generation gap-like response to this question. As someone born before the Internet was invented I fall easily on the side of prohibiting colleagues from checking their email while someone is interviewing for a job.  I find such distraction rude.  But more junior faculty may have a different view point.   I am curious to hear opposing viewpoints.

I myself feel some sort of unspoken rule that the smaller the group, the less appropriate it is to engage with electronics during a presentation.  

For appointments interviewers and interviewees, checking email or an iPad is a categorical "don't" as far as I'm concerned.  I myself have uploaded candidates' scholarship and CVs to an iPad before a day of interviews, but always felt a self-conscious need to let the candidate know that I was not checking my email, but rather referring to her materials. (Ok, maybe I did peek at my email once or twice…I won't do it again.  Oh the shame!)  Perhaps not unsurprisingly, I've never seen a candidate check email or gadgets during an interview.

My working hypothesis is that use of electronics signals that the speaker/presenter/candidate is not (yet) important enough to warrant our full attention, no matter how small the audience or room.  

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *