The president of the University of Texas, William Powers Jr., has asked for – and received – the immediate resignation of UT Law Dean Lawrence Sager. Sager had previously announced he would be leaving the position at the end of the school year. Professor Stefanie Lindquist was named interim dean.
According to reports, there was significant faculty unhappiness – particularly over compensation disparities. In particular, some faculty were apparently unhappy about the school's forgivable loan program which Sager used to lure, or keep, faculty. Dean Sager sent this letter to faculty explaining some of his compensation practices earlier this week.
Elite state schools – and indeed, all elite law schools outside of the Atlantic and Pacific coastal corridors – struggle to recruit and retain those faculty targeted by the private school elites in the corridors. The fact is that Yale, Harvard, NYU, and their counterpart are fierce recruiters with lots of money and relatively little oversight in the allocation of those funds. The question a school like Texas must ask is whether it is willing to absorb the costs of competing with these schools. As is evident in this dispute, the costs go beyond mere dollars (and the risk of taxpayer outrage) and extend deeply into the culture and community of the institution.
The Texas faculty may consider Dean Sager's tenure there to be a failure; it is not at all clear that his former colleagues at NYU, and their peers in the region, would offer a similar assessment. Actually, they might be pretty impressed.
From Sager's letter we can conclude that some profs at elite law schools are making money that rivals that of their football and basketball coaches and that surpasses the salaries of university presidents at some of the nation's best public institutions. They also enjoy far better job security. I guess we will have to stop generally complaining about the overemphasis on athletics if Sager is right.
What did spending $400,000 per year on celebrity faculty earn UT? A two place bump in the rankings (from 2007 to 2011 UT moved from #16 to #14). What did it cost UT students? When Sanger began as dean in 2006, UT tuition was $16,935 in-state, and $29,291 out of state. In five years, tuition has risen 89% for in-state to $32,010 and 62% for out of state to $47,532 per year. I wonder if saddling its students with crushing debt loads was a price worth paying to raise its USNews rankings from T16 to T14?
Note: even if you attribute part of the tuition rise to other factors, engaging in a faculty hiring arms race surely contributed significantly to the rise.
Actually, it is not true that Sager paid up to keep his stars against competing offers from higher-ranked schools. Look at the list of top-ten compensated faculty at Texas. Only one of them (#4) had an offer from a higher-ranked school at the time when his high salary was set up. Their #2 person on the list came from a lower-ranked school and had no competing offers. Only two people on their two-ten list are currently being considered at (or are hired by) a higher-ranked school. This spin is simply not true.
Check out Brian Leiter's blog on this question. He says they did have offers.
You are right. I was wrong. He only says some of them had offers. He could be talking about the two you refer to.