Were it that simple! (I realize in many quarters these are ill-understood or insufficiently appreciated standards.) Alas, even those who profess to abide by such imperatives have different conceptions of what constitutes relevant evidence and the (natural and social) sciences continue to be plagued by conflicts of interests, despite ethical rules and professional codes designed to eliminate these; for one recent example, see here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172317
To get a sense of the breadth and depth of the problem, one should like at the literature I gathered together for two bibliographies: on "Biological Psychiatry, Sullied Psychology and Pharmaceutical Reason," and more generally, "Sullied (Natural & Social) Sciences," both of which are on my Academia page (I'll provide the two links should Steve approve).
![4acc90250cf96fe868754a39bc65ec2d96f569fb[2]](https://www.thefacultylounge.org/wp-content/uploads/typepad/6a00e54f871a9c883301b8d268799c970c.jpeg "4acc90250cf96fe868754a39bc65ec2d96f569fb[2]")
4
Were it that simple! (I realize in many quarters these are ill-understood or insufficiently appreciated standards.) Alas, even those who profess to abide by such imperatives have different conceptions of what constitutes relevant evidence and the (natural and social) sciences continue to be plagued by conflicts of interests, despite ethical rules and professional codes designed to eliminate these; for one recent example, see here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172317
To get a sense of the breadth and depth of the problem, one should like at the literature I gathered together for two bibliographies: on "Biological Psychiatry, Sullied Psychology and Pharmaceutical Reason," and more generally, "Sullied (Natural & Social) Sciences," both of which are on my Academia page (I'll provide the two links should Steve approve).
Sure, Patrick, I would be happy to have the link (it will initially go to spam, as do all comments with links, but I will be on the lookout for it).
Those who have read my posts on ME/CFS and ethnography will know that I am very much aware of differing conceptions of evidence.
Paid Deep State Protesters. Not Good.
OK, here is the link to the Biological Psychiatry… compilation: https://www.academia.edu/13799578/Biological_Psychiatry_Sullied_Psychology_and_Pharmaceutical_Reason_A_Basic_Bibliography
And here is the link to the list on "Sullied Sciences:" https://www.academia.edu/9985005/Sullied_Natural_and_Social_Sciences_A_Basic_Reading_Guide
Relatedly, I have a bibliography for the Philosophy, Psychology, & Methodology for the Social Sciences: https://www.academia.edu/19449832/Philosophy_Psychology_and_Methodology_for_the_Social_Sciences_A_Select_Bibliography