Leon Redbone, Fact Checking, and Ethnography [UPDATED]

I have the below essay today on Social Science Space, explaining how the error in Leon Redbone's obituary can help ethnographers understand the need to fact check their informants:

In the latter case, our ethnographer should have been moved to broach a whole new set of questions to her subjects.

Had Redbone ever questioned his parents about leaving Jerusalem? Had the elder Gobalians ever spoken angrily about Israel or Jordan, and what did they say? Why did they attribute the loss of their property to Israel, and why had they left the Old City so soon after its occupation by Jordan? Did they ever consider themselves Jordanian citizens? How much of this had Redbone discussed with his parents when he was growing up, and what were his thoughts about the Middle East as an adult? What did Handler, who is Jewish, think of the Jerusalem story? Was she aware of its historical inaccuracy? If so, did she ever discuss it with her husband or in-laws?  And most importantly, how would Redbone react to the actual history of the Armenian Quarter, once our ethnographer raised it, and would that change any of his thinking about either his childhood or current events?

The purpose of probing more deeply into the Gobalians’ past would not be to contradict Redbone or shake his faith, but rather to draw a fuller and richer picture of his life. Fact checking, in other words, is not a game of “gotcha,” but rather a means of exploring a subject’s entire background. Fact checking does not challenge or detract from ethnography, but rather enhances its potential by locating narrative fractures, or inflection points, that can lead to more productive inquiries. Thus, our ethnographer would be able to learn far more about Redbone – perhaps the influences on his career, and definitely his relationship with his parents – by searching out the inconsistencies in the family story, rather than simply accepting it as told.

Jerusalem’s Armenian Quarter, circa 1934. Israel would not have possession until 1967.

It is conceivable, for example, that the Gobelians had owned property outside the Armenian Quarter in West Jerusalem, which became part of Israel on May 14, 1948. But in that case, their access to it would have been prohibited by Jordan, which had criminalized communicating with “the enemy,” and did not allow its citizens or residents, including Old City Armenians, to enter Israel. This again would have been a ripe subject for further questioning. How much did Redbone know, or care about, his parents’ interactions with either Israel or Jordan? And had he ever considered reclaiming or obtaining compensation for the family property under Israel’s Absentee Property Law? Had the Gobelians blamed their misfortune on Israel out of loyalty to Jordan or antipathy toward the Jewish state, or was it simply the most easily understood explanation for their friends and children? After all, it is well-known that the Israelis began confiscating Palestinian property beginning in 1948, even though none of it was in the Armenian Quarter.

Perhaps the creation of origin myths is a family tradition of the Gobelians. It would be fascinating to find out, which is something that could be done only by asking.

It is common for ethnographers to explain that their mission is to “give voice” to marginalized populations, which would certainly include Armenian refugees who were the descendants of Turkish genocide survivors. But giving voice should not exclude attempts at verification, which can open the doors to even greater insights and understanding. We can learn more about subjects, without silencing them, by subjecting their stories to fact checking.

***

UPDATE: I have learned that the Oxford American issued a correction after I’d drafted this essay, and changed the text of the Redbone article. The correction reads:

Correction, June 4, 2019: An earlier version of this article stated that the Gobalians lived in Jerusalem’s Armenian Quarter in 1948, but new accounts from family members suggest otherwise. As a result, we have removed some details about the circumstances surrounding their departure. 

The amended text now says nothing about confiscated property, and reads instead: 

According to family members, [Redbone’s] parents were living in present-day Israel in 1948, when the Arab-Israeli War broke out. They fled empty handed for Cyprus, then under British rule.

This development strengthens my point about the importance of fact checking. The New York Times has not made a correction, and did not respond to my letter seeking one.

 

1 Comment

  1. anon

    "Thus, our ethnographer would be able to learn far more about Redbone – perhaps the influences on his career, and definitely his relationship with his parents – by searching out the inconsistencies in the family story, rather than simply accepting it as told."

    Elizabeth Warren?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *